At first glance, it’s a more pleasant-to-look-at panel than the one on the LG G5, despite that phone’s higher resolution. The color balance was also great, with whites neither too cool nor too warm.Įven though we have 1440p displays in 5-inch screens nowadays, You’d be hard pressed to notice the 1080p resolution unless you were really looking for it. The display – one of the frequent failing points for budget devices – was a solid performer too. Colors were vibrant, blacks were deep, viewing angles were about as good as you’d expect from a higher end device. They also have a bit of that ‘2.5D’ effect going on, curving towards the edges. ![]() But the slim design and grippy back make it feel a bit more manageable than I expected, and the bezels are kept to a minimum. Needless to say, the thing is huge – right up there with original Nexus 6. I’m not exaggerating when I say it’s probably the best-looking budget phone I’ve ever held – probably better than a few flagships too. The rose gold accents that only show up at certain lighting angles are the cherry on top. The royal blue back is plastic, but the soft-touch matte makes it look and feel classy, especially with the gunmetal frame surrounding it. Those rose gold accents make a sweet contrast with the back’s deep blue. ![]() I actually think it looks and feels better than ZTE’s higher-end Axon 7. Maybe I’m just a sucker for the the color scheme, but ZTE nailed the design here. The ZMAX Pro’s 6-inch screen vs the Moto Z’s 5.5-inch one.īasically, it’s very similar to the Moto G4 Plus at a cheaper price point, with caveat that you’re still locked to MetroPCS to start, and the connectivity bands mean your’e largely stuck with T-Mobile/MetroPCS.Īlso, unfortunately, the phone doesn’t appear to have NFC, so that fingerprint sensor is locked to security only (pun intended). 13 MP, PDAF rear camera, 5MP front camera.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |